According to Tennessee V. Garner, what does Prong 3 require regarding warnings?

In the context of Tennessee v. Garner, Prong 3 specifically emphasizes that law enforcement officers must give verbal warnings before using deadly force when feasible. This means that officers are required to assess the situation and determine if a warning can be issued without compromising their safety or the safety of others involved. The key aspect of this requirement is the word "feasible," which acknowledges that there may be circumstances where warning a suspect is not practical or safe due to the dynamics of the encounter.

The intent behind this requirement is to preserve life and provide suspects with an opportunity to comply with police commands before the use of potentially lethal measures is considered. This embodies the principle of de-escalation in policing, encouraging officers to seek alternatives before resorting to deadly force.